{"id":535216,"date":"2026-04-21T11:45:37","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T08:45:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reform.news\/?p=535216"},"modified":"2026-04-21T12:03:33","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T09:03:33","slug":"reform-news-telegram-channel-poll-who-would-you-vote-for-in-the-coordination-council-elections-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/reform-news-telegram-channel-poll-who-would-you-vote-for-in-the-coordination-council-elections-results","title":{"rendered":"Reform.news Telegram Channel Poll \u201cWho Would You Vote for in the Coordination Council Elections?\u201d \u2013 Results"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Yesterday morning, we published a poll in our Telegram channel asking \u201cWho would you vote for in the Coordination Council elections?\u201d<\/a>. For 24 hours, anyone interested could anonymously vote for the electoral blocs participating in the elections. Today, we are publishing the results of the poll \u2014 there is a clear leader.<\/p>\n

A total of 2,102 people<\/strong> took part in our vote. The poll form was viewed 16,200 times<\/strong>. We did not notice any obvious signs of vote manipulation.<\/p>\n

It should be noted that participation in the Telegram poll was not limited to those who are eligible to vote in the Coordination Council elections. Some of those who took part in the poll also indicated that they would not vote in the real elections \u2014 there were 637<\/strong> such respondents, or 30%<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

The responses were distributed as follows:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Latushka Coalition and the For Freedom Movement<\/strong> (electoral number 9) \u2014 38%<\/strong> (803 votes)<\/li>\n
  2. \u201cStop Being Afraid!\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 3) \u2014 6%<\/strong> (128 votes)<\/li>\n
  3. Volia Movement<\/strong> (electoral number 4) \u2014 5%<\/strong> (105 votes)<\/li>\n
  4. \u201cEuropean Choice\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 2) \u2014 4%<\/strong> (92 votes)<\/li>\n
  5. \u201cBelarusians of Action\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 8) \u2014 4%<\/strong> (86 votes)<\/li>\n
  6. 6\/7. \u201cUnited Civic Platform\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 5) \u2014 4%<\/strong> (73 votes)<\/li>\n
  7. 6\/7. \u201cNastup\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 6) \u2014 4%<\/strong> (73 votes)<\/li>\n
  8. \u201cYour Voice\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 1) \u2014 3%<\/strong> (69 votes)<\/li>\n
  9. \u201cLaw and Order\u201d<\/strong> (electoral number 7) \u2014 2%<\/strong> (36 votes)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    If the result is adjusted to exclude those who took part in the poll but decided not to vote in the Coordination Council elections, and taking into account the established minimum threshold of 3%, the shares would be distributed as follows:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Latushka Coalition and the For Freedom Movement (No. 9) \u2014 56.2%<\/li>\n
    2. \u201cStop Being Afraid!\u201d (No. 3) \u2014 9.0%<\/li>\n
    3. Volia Movement (No. 4) \u2014 7.3%<\/li>\n
    4. \u201cEuropean Choice\u201d (No. 2) \u2014 6.4%<\/li>\n
    5. \u201cBelarusians of Action\u201d (No. 8) \u2014 6.0%<\/li>\n
    6. \u201cUnited Civic Platform\u201d (No. 5) \u2014 5.1%<\/li>\n
    7. \u201cNastup\u201d (No. 6) \u2014 5.1%<\/li>\n
    8. \u201cYour Voice\u201d (No. 1) \u2014 4.8%<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      The \u201cLaw and Order\u201d list (No. 7), which failed to pass the threshold after receiving an actual 2.5%, would not take part in the distribution of mandates.<\/p>\n

      If 80 seats were allocated based on the adjusted version after excluding the list below 3% and distributing mandates using the D\u2019Hondt method, the result would be as follows:<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Latushka Coalition and the For Freedom Movement \u2014 46 seats<\/li>\n
      2. \u201cStop Being Afraid!\u201d \u2014 7 seats<\/li>\n
      3. Volia Movement \u2014 6 seats<\/li>\n
      4. \u201cEuropean Choice\u201d \u2014 5 seats<\/li>\n
      5. \u201cBelarusians of Action\u201d \u2014 4 seats<\/li>\n
      6. \u201cUnited Civic Platform\u201d \u2014 4 seats<\/li>\n
      7. \u201cNastup\u201d \u2014 4 seats<\/li>\n
      8. \u201cYour Voice\u201d \u2014 4 seats<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        Please note that this is an unofficial poll. The results of the real elections will differ. Also, check whether we may have made any errors in the calculations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        Yesterday morning, we published a poll in our Telegram channel asking \u201cWho would you vote for in the Coordination Council elections?\u201d. For 24 hours, anyone interested could anonymously vote for the electoral blocs participating in the elections. Today, we are publishing the results of the poll \u2014 there is a clear leader. A total of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":119,"featured_media":519376,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_sharing_image":{"poster":"https:\/\/reform.news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/69e73d694cc16.jpg","width":1200,"height":630,"template":"691142dd","mode":"auto"},"_sharing_image_fieldset":{"dTVKfmI95PYT":"Reform.news Telegram Channel Poll \u201cWho Would You Vote for in the Coordination Council Elections?\u201d \u2013 Results"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[142339,142338,143090],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-535216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-main","category-news","category-politics"],"wps_subtitle":"","permalink_manager":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/119"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=535216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535216\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/519376"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=535216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=535216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/reform.news\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=535216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}